Descriptive Analyses on English Test Items based on the Application of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Imanuel Kamlasi

Abstract


This investigation analyzed the English test items based on the application of revised Bloom’s taxonomy. This study was categorized as descriptive qualitative research. The instrument of this study was English test sheet which was used in final semester test in senior high school. In analyzing the data; the researchers applied four steps: codifying; classifying; analyzing and discussing. Anderson, et.al. (2001) revised the Bloom’s Taxonomy that thinking is an active process so verbs were used rather than nouns. The findings showed that remembering taxonomy made 22 items or 44%. Understanding taxonomy presented 2 items or 4%. Applying taxonomy made 21 items or 42%. Analyzing taxonomy made 5 items or 10%. While there was no item found in both evaluating and creating taxonomy. Therefore; creating taxonomy was not used to ask the students in the English test. Regarding to the findings of this investigation; teachers need to distribute the revised Bloom’s taxonomy in constructing test items. Furthermore; teachers need to use WH questions in the test items.


Keywords


analyses; items, revised Bloom’s taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, et.al. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Blooms’ Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman: New York

Araisan, W. P. & Russel, K. M. 2008. Classroom Assessment: Concept and Application. McGraw-Hill Companies: Singapore

Brown, D. H. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Practices. San Francisco State University

Brown, D. J. 2005. Testing in Language Programs. McGraw-Hill Companies: Singapore

Bloom, B. S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co.

Cohen, L. et. el. 2007. Research Methods in Education. Sixth Edition. Routledge: London-New York.

Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. 2007. Language Testing and Assessment. Routledge Tylor & Francis Group: London- New York

Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Teacher. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press: London

Kamlasi, I. 2013. Developing Portfolio as an Alternative Testing Device in Descriptive Text Writing. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2013. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere

Matra, D. S. 2014. Teacher Questioning in Classroom Interaction. A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching and Literature (Celt). Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 1-128, Semarang, July 2014 website: http://www.journalcelt.com http://journalcelt.blogspot.com

Mutay, C. N. 2012. Critical Review of Oral Questioning Technique in Secondary School English Language Teaching in Eldoret Municipality, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS) (ISSN: 2141-6990

Soozandehfar, M.A. S & Adeli, M.R. 2016. A Critical Appraisal of Bloom’s Taxonomy. American Research Journal of English and Literature(ARJEL) ISSN(online)- 2378-9026 Volume 2, 2016.

Tangsakul, P. 2017. Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy to Analyze Reading Comprehension Questions in Team Up in English 1-3 and Grade 9 English O-Net Tests. International Journal of Research-Grantaalayah. Vol.5 (Iss.7): July, 2017. ISSN- 2350-0530(O), ISSN- 2394-3629

Tofade, at.el. 2013. Best Practice Strategies for Effective Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2013; 77 (7) Article 155.

Wilen, W. W. 1991. Questioning Skills, for Teachers. What Research Says to the Teacher. Third Edition. National Education Association: Washington




DOI: 10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.847

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 8 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Metathesis: journal of English language, literature, and teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

English Education Department, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia 

ISSN: 2580-2712 (print) and 2580-2720 (online)

Jalan Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 56116

Phone (0293) 364113  Fax (0293) 362438

Website: http://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/metathesis