Title:

PENGALIHAN ANGGARAN BELANJA DAN DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP OUTPUT SEKTOR PRODUKSI DAN PENDAPATAN RUMAH TANGGA INDONESIA

Author:

Mail Muhammad Anas(1*)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/rep.v4i1.1339| Abstract views : 135 | PDF views : 0

Abstract


Kebijakan belanja subsidi BBM sejak sebelum tahun 2014 dianggap kurang tepat karena sebagian besar BBM bersubsidi dinikmati oleh kalangan mampu dan belanja subsidi BBM membebani anggaran belanja produktif seperti infrastruktur. Menjelang berakhirnya tahun 2014, pemerintah mengalihkan anggaran subsidi BBM untuk membangun infrastruktur. Penelitian ini bertujuan mensimulasikan kebijakan tersebut dengan alat analisis Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi (SNSE) dan mengkuantifikasi dampaknya terhadap pertumbuhan output dan pendapatan rumah tangga Indonesia. Berdasarkan simulasi kebijakan, diperoleh bahwa pembangunan infrastruktur modal manusia memberikan dampak positif yang lebih besar terhadap perekonomian Indonesia dibandingkan infrastruktur ekonomi. Pembangunan infrastruktur diperlukan guna mempercepat peningkatan kegiatan ekonomi dalam jangka panjang

Keywords


subsidi BBM; infrastruktur; SNSE; output; pendapatan rumah tangga

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aschauer, David Alan. 1989. “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics 23(September 1988): 177–200.

Aschauer, David Alan. 1989.”is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics 23 (September 1988): 177-200

Bonakkdarpour, Mohsen, Robert Brodesky, and Karen A. Campbell. 2014. Transportation Infrastructure Investment: Macroeconomic and Industry Contribution of the Federal Highway and Mass Transit Program. In Transportation Construction Coalition, Philadelphia

Diop, Ndiame.2014. Why is Reducing Energy Subsidies a Prudent, Fair, and Transformative Policy for Indonesia? Jakarta.

Fathurrahman, Fahman. 2014. “Simulating Indonesian Fuel Subsidy Reform: A Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Analysis.” Middle East Technical University

Ford, Robert, and Pierre Poret. 1991. “Infrastructure and Private-Sector Productivity.” Economic Studies 17(Autumn): 63–89.

Kementerian Keuangan. Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat. https://bit.ly/2SfxdqH

Ogarenko, luliia, and Klaus Hubacek. 2013. “Eliminating Indirect Energy Subsidies in Ukraine : Estimation of Environmental and Socioeconomic Effect Using Input-Output Modelling”

Palei, Tatyana. 2015. “Assessing the Impact of Infrastructure on

Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness.” Procedia Economics and Finance 23(October 2014): 168–75. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212567115003226

Raihan, Selim. 2011. Infrastructure and Growth and Poverty in

Bangladesh. Manila. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37882/

Santoso, Singgih. 2018. Menguasai Statistik dengan SPSS 25. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo

Schwab, Klaus. 2015. The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015: Full Data Edition. Geneva. http://t.co/OW1SDFxUBK

Widodo, Tri, Gumilang Aryo Sahadewo, Sekar Utami Setiastuti, and Maftuchatul Chaerriyah. 2012. “Impact of Fuel Subsidy Removal on Government Spending.” In Energy Market Integration in East Asia: Theories, Electricity Sector and Subsidies, Jakarta: ERIA, 173–206




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/rep.v4i1.1339

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 135 times
PDF - 0 times

Cited By

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal REP (Riset Ekonomi Pembangunan)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal REP (Riset Ekonomi Pembangunan)

P-ISSN: 2541-433X E-ISSN: 2508-0205

Published by Department of Economic Development, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Tidar

View My Stats