Development of Quizizz Application-Based Test to Measure Science Process Skills of High School Students on Biodiversity Materials

Dian Pangestuti; Dewi Febriyana; Isna Robiatul Adhawiyah; Rifqi Tiara Febriyanti; Setiyo Prajoko

doi:10.31002/ijobe.v4i1.4125

Title:

Development of Quizizz Application-Based Test to Measure Science Process Skills of High School Students on Biodiversity Materials

Author:

Dian Pangestuti⁽¹⁾

Dewi Febriyana⁽²⁾

Isna Robiatul Adhawiyah⁽³⁾

Rifqi Tiara Febriyanti⁽⁴⁾

Setiyo Prajoko^(5*)

(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(3) Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(4) Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(5) Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/ijobe.v4i1.4125| Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid science process skills test both in terms of content and constructs. The selected biodiversity material is integrated into this test. The quizizz application is used so that this test can be accessed online. This study uses the Research and Development (R&D) 4-D model, namely define, design, develop, and disseminate. The final product of this development research is a science process-based test instrument to measure student skills that have been declared valid and feasible by experts in the form of 50 multiple-choice questions. This research trial was conducted on 40 high school students majoring in Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Quantitative data analysis was carried out based on the internal characteristics of the test, such as validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discriminatory power. The results showed that the validity test contained 28 valid questions and 22 invalid questions. In the difficulty index, there are 33 easy questions, 16 easy questions and 0 difficult questions. There is also a distinguishing power of good criteria consisting of 12 questions, sufficient criteria for 20 questions, and flawed criteria for 18 questions. In the validity test with the material aspect, an average of 74% quite valid, the construction aspect on average 77% quite valid, and the language aspect are 91% quite valid. The students' science process skills are also classified as good, with 76.22 in the high category.

Keywords

Science process skill test; Instrument; Biodiversity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Aji, B. S., & Winarno, M. E. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian pengetahuan mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan (PJOK) Kelas VIII semester gasal. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(7), 1449-1463.

Alhamid, T., & Anufia, B. (2019). Resume: Instrumen Pengumpulan Data. Sorong: Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN).

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam suatu Penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics) Vol. 2 No. 1, Juli 2017, hal. 28-36

Arikunto, S. (2006). Metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Bina Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arnold, I. J. (2009). Do examinations influence student evaluations?. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(4), 215-224.

Asrul, A., Ananda, R., & Rosnita, R. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (2014). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Darmawan, D. (2012). Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Fraenkel, L., Falzer, P., Fried, T., Kohler, M., Peters, E., Kerns, R., & Leventhal, H. (2012). Measuring pain impact versus pain severity using a numeric rating scale. Journal of general internal medicine, 27(5), 555-560.

Fadillah, E. N. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 1(2), 123-134.

Gerald DF, & Okey, JR (1980). Tes keterampilan proses sains terpadu untuk siswa IPA SMP. Pendidikan Sains, 64 (5), 601-608.

Haryati, S. (2012). Research and Development (R&D) sebagai salah satu model penelitian dalam bidang pendidikan. Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika, 37(1), 15.

Mahmudah, M., Yaunin, Y., & Lestari, Y. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku seksual remaja di Kota Padang. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, 5(2).

Matondang, Zulkifli. (2009). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa Vol. 6 No.1, (87-97).

Mulyawati, E. (2016). Keanekaragaman Hayati. Bandung: Universitas Pasundan.

Nurhasanah. 2016. Jurnal Penggunaan Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Siswa dalam Pembelajaran konsep Kalor dengan Model Inquiri Terbimbing. 2 (12), 17-18.

Nurmaliah, dkk. (2014). Penggunaan Metode Karyawisata untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati, Jurnal Biotik, ISSN: 2337-9812, Vol. 2, No. 1, Ed. April 2014. Keguruan. UIN Syarif Hidayatulullah Jakarta. Jakarta.

Nugraheni, D., & Winarni, D. S. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar science teacherpreneurship berbasis karakter bagi mahasiswa pendidikan IPA. In Seminar Nasional Sains & Entrepreneurship (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Prajoko, S., Amin, M., Rohman, F., & Gipayana, M. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Mata Kuliah Praktikum IPA di SD. Seminar Nasional IPA VII, 2(1), 821–831.

Prajoko, S., Amin, M., Rohman, F., & Gipayana, M. (2016). Development Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Skills Assessment in Science Lab Course. The 4th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation, 1(1), 240–249.

Purwanto, D. (2013). Pengembangan Media Komik IPA Terpadu Tema Pencemaran Air Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Untuk Siswa SMP Kelas VII. Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains, 1(01).

Sardiman Arief, dkk. (1996). Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, hal 6

Semiawan, C. dkk. (1985). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses, Bagaimana Mengaktifkaa Siswa dalam Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Shahali, EHM, & Halim, L. (2010). Pengembangan dan validasi tes keterampilan proses sains terpadu. Ilmu Procedia-Sosial dan Perilaku, 9, 142- 146.

Serin. (2011). The Effects of The Computer Based Instruction on The Achievementand Problem Solving Skills of The Science and Technology Students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol 10 Issue 1.

Sudijono, A. (2008). Dasar Proses dan Efektivitas Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan Jasmani. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Sudijono, A. (2013). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2014). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syarif, E. A., & Syamsurizal, S. (2019). Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympiad Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018. Bioeducation Journal, 3(2), 142-150.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S. & Semmel, M.I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Minneapolis: University Of Minneasota.

Warsita, B. (2008). Teknologi Pembelajaran: Landasan dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Winarno, M.E. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Malang: Media Cakrawala Utama Press.

Yani, A., Sahriah, S., & Haerunnisa, H. (2018). Efektivitas Pendekatan Saintifik Dengan Media Booklet Higher Order Thinking Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Sma Di Kabupaten Wajo. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 7(1), 1-12.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/ijobe.v4i1.4125