Effectiveness of Mathematical Learning Model to Stimulate Critical Thinking on Mathematics Learning Outcomes of High School Students

Dafid Slamet Setiana; Rusgianto Heri Santosa

doi:10.31002/ijome.v3i1.2331

Title:

Effectiveness of Mathematical Learning Model to Stimulate Critical Thinking on Mathematics Learning Outcomes of High School Students

Author:

Dafid Slamet Setiana^(1*)

Rusgianto Heri Santosa⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/ijome.v3i1.2331| Abstract views : 117 | PDF views : 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the mathematics learning model to stimulate critical thinking on student mathematics learning outcomes compared to the direct learning model in class XII science students of senior high school in Pacitan. The type of research is quasi-experimental, with a population of all students of class XII IPA of SMA N 2 Pacitan. The sample consists of 28 students of class XII IPA-1 as an experimental class and class XII of IPA-2 of 28 students as a control class. The sampling technique was purposive random sampling. Data collection techniques using the test. The test is a student's initial ability test and a student's mathematics learning outcomes test. The analysis technique of the data used in this study is the t-test, while the analysis of prerequisite tests includes tests of normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that mathematics learning using the mathematics learning model to stimulate critical thinking was more effectively applied in learning compared to the direct learning model of the mathematics learning outcomes of high school students in terms of the results of the t-test analysis and the average test scores of learning outcomes.

Keywords

effectiveness; critical thinking; mathematical learning model; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, L. & Krathwohl. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.

Chukwuyenum, A. N. (2013). Impact of critical thinking on performance in mathematics among senior secondary school students in Lagos State. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3(5), 18-25.

Dahlan, J. A. (2012). Implementasi strategi pembelajaran konflik kognitif dalam upaya meningkatkan high order thinking siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v13i2.372.2012

Depdiknas.(2005). Rencana strategis departemen pendidikan nasional tahun 2005-2009. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Facione. P. A. (2010). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. Retrieved on 17 August 2015, from http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/what&why2006.pdf.

Fagin, B., Harper, J., Baird, L., Hadfield, S., & Sward, R. (2006). Critical thinking and computer science: Implicit and explicit connections. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(4), 171-177. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1127389.1127423

Fathurrohman, M. (2017). Model – model pembelajaran inovatif. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. Retrieved on 5 Agustus 2015, from http://www.byu.edu/fc/pages/tchlrnpages/Fink/Fink_Article.doc.

Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). Innovative tasks to improve critical and creative thinking skills. Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12, pp.138-145.

Lambertus. (2009). Pentingnya melatih keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Forum Kependidikan, 28(2), 136-142.

Masek, A., Yamin, S. (2012). The impact of instructional methods on critical thinking: A comparison of problem-based learning and conventional approach in engineering education. International Scholarly Research Network. doi:10.5402/2012/759241

Moore, T. (2004). The critical thinking debate: How general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000168469

Onions, P. E. W. (2009). Thinking critically: An introduction, working paper. Retrieved on 17 August 2015, from http://www.patrickonions.org/docs/academic/2009%20Thinking%20critically.pdf

Potts & Bonnie.(1994). Strategies for teaching critical thinking. ERIC/AE Digest. Retrieved on 17 August 2015, from http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-1/critical.htm

Romberg, T. (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. New York: New York Press.

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2007). The critical thinking community: Foundation for critical thinking. Defining critical thinking. Retrieved on 5 August 2015, from http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define_ critical_thinking.cfm.

Setiana, D. S. (2018). Pengembangan model pembelajaran matematika untuk menstimulasi berpikir kritis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Setiana, D. S., Santosa, H. R., Izzaty, R. E., & Herawan, T. (2019). Developing mathematics learning tools to stimulate critical thinking. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 128, 81-90. doi:10.33832/ijast.2019.129.08

Shakirova, D. M. (2007). Technology for the shaping of college students’ and upper-grade students’ critical thinking. Russian Education & Society, 49(9), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393490905

Smith, M. K. (2009). Teori pembelajaran dan pengajaran: Mengukur kesuksesan anda dalam proses belajar dan mengajar bersama psikolog pendidikan dunia. (Abdul Qodir Shaleh, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Mirza Media Pustaka.

Tjalla, A. (2008). Potret mutu pendidikan Indonesia ditinjau dari hasil-hasil studi internasional. Psiko-Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Konseling, 6(2), 1-22.

Weinstein, S & Preiss, D. (2017). Scaffolding to promote critical thinking and learner autonomy among pre-service education students. Journal of Education and Training, 4(1), 69-87. doi:10.5296/jet.v4i1.9871

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v3i1.2331