Title:

Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Era 4.0: Studi Konten Analisis New Media Pemerintah Kota Magelang

Author:

Mail Dedi Setiawan(1*)
Mail Rutiana Dwi Wahyunengseh(2)

(1) Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia., Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia., Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/jpalg.v4i2.3495| Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0

Abstract


The use of ICT in the public sector has been widely applied in various countries including Indonesia. One of the goals is to make it easier to disseminate policies to the public. From the practice level, the use of new media / social media in Indonesia has been regulated in a law. The city of Magelang is one of the cities that applies the use of ICT to support public services and is considered successful by the central government so that it has received various awards. However, in Magelang City, the problem of poverty is still a priority to be resolved. This study aims to describe the use of ICT types of social media by the Magelang City Government in disseminating poverty issues and to analyze the extent to which Magelang City is prepared to utilize social media to disseminate poverty issues. The qualitative research method is content analysis research with data collection in the form of content content analysis, documentation, and interviews with purposive techniques. Data were analyzed using content analysis by krippendorf. The results of the study show that the government of Magelang City has not used social media to disseminate poverty reduction policies. This can be seen from; (i) social media management related to the proportion of content issues uploaded on social media that shows dissemination related to poverty issues has not been specifically planned to be published, seen from the very small number of posts related to poverty issues, (ii) government responses in response to comments and questions from followers tend not respond so that the use of social media still goes in one direction. Thus, ICT has not played a role in its social aspects for information dissemination, social learning, dialogue, and networking. This can be seen from; (i) there is no strategy in managing content and monitoring evaluation to see the growth of followers, (ii) the response of followers / society still tends to be passive by only giving likes to government-owned social media uploads that are one-way in nature.

Keywords


content analysis; ICT4D; policy; new media; poverty reduction.

Full Text:

##Full Text##

References


Annur, C. M. (2019, May 16). Survei APJII: Penetrasi Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Capai 64,8%. Retrieved October 27, 2019, from https://katadata.co.id/berita/2019/05/16/survei-apjii-penetrasi-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-capai-648

Asamoah, K. (2019). E-governance in Africa's local goverments: Do district assemblies in Ghana optimize the use of websites and social media? The Electronic Journal of Infromation System in Developing Countries, 85(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12082

Atiko, G., Sudrajat, R. H., Nasionalita, K,. (2016). Analisis Strategi Promosi Pariwisata Melalui Media Sosial Oleh Kementerian Pariwisata Ri (Studi Deskriptif Pada Akun Instagram @Indtravel). Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 15(3), 378-389.

Bjorklund, F. (2016). E-government and moral citizenship: the case of Estonia. Citizenship Studies, 20(6-7), pp.914-931. Doi: abs/10.1080/13621025.2016.1213222

Bappenas. 2015. Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Strategi Peduli Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Bappenas.

Bappenas. 2019. Program Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jakarta: Bappenas.

Badan Pusat Statisik Kota Magelang. 2019. Kota Magelang Dalam Angka. Magelang: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Magelang.

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. 2019. Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan. Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.

Carlo Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214831

Dwi Wahyunengseh, R., Hastarjo, S., Mulyaningsih, T., & G. Suharto. D. (2020). Digital Governance and Digital Divide: A Matrix of the Poor's Vulnerabilities. Policy & Governance Review, 4(2), 152-166. Doi: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i2.296

Flor A. (2015) Constructing Theories of Change for Information Society Impact Research. In: Chib A., May J., Barrantes R. (eds) Impact of Information Society Research in the Global South, pp.45-62. Springer, Singapore. DOI:1 0.1 007/978-981-287-381-1_3. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-287-381-1_

Furqon A. M., Hermansyah, D., Sari, R., Sukma, A., Akbar,Y., Rakhmawati, A. N., (2018). Analisis Sosial Media Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Respons Warganet. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 17(2), 177-188.

Gil-Garciaa, J.R., Dawesa, S.S., Pardoa, T.A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633-636. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181

Indonesia Peringkat Kelima Dunia dalam Jumlah Pengguna Internet. (2019, September 11). Retrieved October 27, 2019, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/09/11/indonesia-peringkat-kelima-dunia-dalam-jumlah-pengguna-internet

Johansson, K.M., and Raunio, T. (2019). Government communication in a comparative perspective in Johansson, K.M. & Nygren, G. (eds.) Close and distant: Political executive–media relations in four countries, pp. 127-148. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

Kelleher, J. (2017) October 27, 2017, Implementation of e-Government to be accelerated in Indonesia. Opengovasia.com. Retrieved from: https://www.opengovasia.com/articles/6761-implementation-of-e-government-to-be-accelerated-in-indonesiaKemp, S. (2019) Januari 31, 2019, Digital 2019: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-indonesia

Khan, G. F. (2017). Social Media for Government. New York, United States: Springer Publishing.

Kozma, R. B., & Vota, W. S. (2014). ICT in developing countries: Policies, implementation, and impact. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 885-894). New York: Springer. retrieved from www.researchgate.net

Knox, C.C. (2016). Public Administrator's Use of Social Media Platforms: Overcoming the Legitimacy Dilemma?. Administration & Society, 48(4), 477-496.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction To Its Methodology.

Meijer, A.,Bolivar R.P.M., Gil-Garcia R. J,. (2018)From E-Government to Digital Era Governance and Beyond: Lessons from 15 Years of Research into Information and Communications Technology in the Public Sector.

Mickoleit, A. (2014). Social Media Use by Governments: A Policy Primer to Discuss Trends, Identify Policy Opportunities and Guide Decision Makers, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 26, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrcmghmk0s-en.

Osei-Kojo, A. (2017). E-goverment and public service quality in Ghana. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(3), e1620. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1620

Pemerintah Indonesia. 2003. Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government di Indonesia

Peraturan Menteri PAN Nomor 83 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Pemanfaatan Media Sosial di Instansi Pemerintah

Perpres No. 15 Tahun 2010 tentang Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan dan membentuk Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan atau (TNP2K).

Prabhakaran, A., & Kalyani, K. (2014). The thumb generation: ICT application in libraries. Journal of Library, Information and Communication Technology (JLICT), 6(1-2), 42-47. Retrieved from http://www.escienceworld.in/index.php/jlict/article/view/61/61

Ramadani, Thoriq. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Komunikasi Publik di Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i1.369

Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/2057047317691054

Spacek, D. (2018). Social Media Use in Public Administration: The Case of Facebook Use by Czech Regions. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0019

Schivinski, B., & Dabrowski, D. (2014). The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(2), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.871323

Wolfson, T., Crowell, J., Reyes, C., & Bach, A. (2017). Emancipatory broadband adoption: Toward a critical theory of digital inequality in the urban United States. Communication, Culture and Critique, 10, 441-459. Doi:10.1111/cccr.12166




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/jpalg.v4i2.3495

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
##Full Text## - 0 times

Cited By

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Dedi Setiawan, Rutiana Dwi Wahyunengseh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance

Public Administration Programme, Universitas Tidar

Jl.Kapten Suparman, No.39, Potrobangsan, Magelang Utara, Kota Magelang, Jawa Tengah, 56116

http://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/publicadmini

 P-ISSN: 2614-4433

 E-ISSN: 2614-4441