Title:


Deconstruction of Binary Opposition in Kritikus Adinan Story by Budi Darma


Author:


Mail Iswadi Bahardur(1*)

(1) STKIP PGRI Sumbar, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/transformatika.v2i1.602| Abstract views : 771 | PDF views : 0

Abstract


Writing this article backed by multi interpretation problems raised by a text, especially literary texts. Multi interpretation is inseparable from the consciousness and unconscious of the subject of the author, as well as the process of reconstruction by the reader. Based on this article this article aims to describe the results of deconstructing binary opposition readings on the story of Kritikus Adinan by Budi Darma. The data source used is the story of Kritikus Adinan. The research method used is descriptive analysis with the theoretical perspective of deconstruction of Jaques Derrida. Based on the findings and data analysis, the results show the following. First, the deconstruction readings of the Kritikus Adinan can not be separated from the word-scoring process as Jaques Derrida puts it in deconstruction theory. Secondly, the reconstruction of Kritkus Adinan’s story leads to unfamiliarity but leads the reader to discover the marginalized texts. Third, based on the results of deconstruction reading in the story of Kritikus Adinan, there is a binary opposition that has been denied and broken by the author by presenting a reversal of fact.  Suggestions that can be recommended are many other literary works that are worthy and important to be reviewed by other researchers to uncover the phenomenon of reversing the facts by the author.


Keywords


Derrida deconstruction; kritikus Adinan; binary opposition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adiwijaya, Dominique Rio. (2011). Semiologi, strukturalisme, post-strukturalisme, dan kajian desain komunikasi. Humaniora, 2(1), 803-813.

Asmara, R., & Kusumaningrum, W.R. (2015). Dekonstruksi makna simbolik kesenian Sintren sebagai pendidikan seks usia bermuatan budaya (sebuah kontribusi kesenian tradisional Jawa-Sunda terhadap permasalahan sosial). The 1st University Research Colloquium (URECOL), Surakarta, 1, 107-115. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11617/5145.

Budianto, V. Irmayanti Moeliono. (2007). Membaca postrukturalisme pada karya sastra. Wacana, 9(1), 21-31.

Bradley, Arthur. (2008). Derrida’s of grammatology; an Edinburgh philosophical guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Darma, Budi. (2017). Kumpulan cerita Kritikus Adinan. Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Karkaba, Cherki. (2010). Deconstructing identity in postcolonial fiction. ELOPE: English Languange Overseas Perspektives and Enquiries, 7(2), 91-99.

Karnanta, Kukuh Yudha. (2013). Paradigma teori arena produksi kultural sastra: Kajian terhadap pemikiran Piere Bourdieu. Poetika, 1(1), 3-15.

Purwantini. (2017). Dekonstruksi struktur penceritaan dalam novel Arok-Dedes: Kajian intertekstual. Atavisme, 20(2), 197-210.

Ratun, Untoro. (2009). Memahami karya sastra postmodern melalui pembacaan deconstruksi Derrida. Widyariset, 12(3), 75-82.

Ronidin. (2015). Pembacaan dekonstruksi cerpen Zina karya Putu Wijaya. Poetika, 11(1), 36-51.

Sarup, Madan. (2008). Panduan pengantar untuk memahami poststrukturalisme & postmodrrnisme. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Satriani, Irma. (2016). Postmodernisme dalam novel Bilangan Fu karya Ayu Utami. Retorika, 9(1), 25-35.

Ungkang, Marcelus. (2013). Dekonstruksi Jaques Derrida sebagai strategi pembacaan teks sastra. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 1(1), 30-37.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v2i1.602


DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v2i1.602.g498

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 771 times
PDF - 0 times

Cited By

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.