The Effects of Three Different Assessment Types on Text Revisions: A Study of Indonesian EFL Learners


Mail Andri Suherman(1*)

(1) Language Centre, University of Mataram, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
10.31002/metathesis.v3i2.1473| Abstract views : 401 | PDF views : 0


This research article aimed at exploring the effects of three different assessments (self-, peer-, and teacher-) on students’ text revision. Ten Indonesian tertiary-level EFL students participated in this study. It investigated the extent to which three types of assessment facilitate text revision, and analyzed students’ perception of these assessments. The research methods used were students’ text revision and semi-structure interview. The findings revealed two main points. First, the results showed that students made the total of 2,096 revision changes across 40 drafts, with lower percentage of self-feedback incorporated into their revision. Furthermore, the findings indicated that students had a tendency to engage in self-assessment practice more often when revising their drafts. Second, students mostly appreciated teacher-assessment, as opposed to under half of them favoured peer-assessment. In contrast, self-assessment showed a balanced response between positive and negative comments. The implications of this study were provide practical insight to EFL teachers into how three assessment types (teacher-, peer-, and self-) can be developed to help improve students’ writing performance, and to inform EFL teachers with some suggestions to explore students’ perceptions regarding the three assessments to help facilitate quality-enhancing text revisions.


Three assessment types, text revision, EFL students

Full Text:



Andrade, H., & Y. Du. (2007). Student response to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181.

Birjandi, P., & N. Hadidi Tamjid. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 513–533.

Chang, C. C. , Tseng, K.H., & Lou, S. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58, 303-320.

Chen, Y. M. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: a longitudinal case

study’. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235–262.

Cresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54(3), 235–244.

Davison, C. & C. Leung. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393–415.

Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovation in Education and Training International, 32, 175–187.

Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. ELT Journal, 51, 12-20.

Lin, S.-J., Liu, Z.-F., & Yuan, S.-M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: attitude and achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(2), 13.

Little, D. (2005). The common European framework and the European language portfolio: involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22, 321-326.

Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacherassessments in Japanese university EFL writing

classrooms’. Language Testing, 26(1) 75–100.

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nicol, D. J., & D. Macfarlane-Dick. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Pond, K., Ul-Haq, R., & Wade, W. (1995). Peer review: a precursor to peer assessment. Innovation in Education and Training International,32, 314-323.

Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006).The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.

Sengupta, S. (2000). An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2

secondary school learners. System 28(1), 97–113.

Taras, M. (2003). To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 549–565.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v3i2.1473

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 401 times
PDF - 0 times

Cited By


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching is published by English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia in collaboration with Asosiasi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Se-Indonesia (APSPBI) 

ISSN: 2580-2712 (print) and 2580-2720 (online)

Jalan Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 56116

Phone (0293) 364113  Fax (0293) 362438

View My Stats